If Feminist Frequency Were 100% Honest With Us – Gaming Wildlife

MISOGYNY!!!

About The_Director

Home of the 100% honest series. A comedy show that focuses on the the culture of gaming and those who are apart of it. A social experiment on learning about different types of gamers as well as CEOs and their various companies.

Leave a Reply

85 Comments on "If Feminist Frequency Were 100% Honest With Us – Gaming Wildlife"

Oddworld Inhabitant
Guest

I’m scared to look at the YouTube comments…

Personally, though, I find FemFreq interesting if only because, as “Critical Miss” pointed out (), few people are actually hardened supporters of the show, but many support just so they won’t be associated with it’s more… shall we say “unfiltered” critics. It was pretty much inevitable that somebody figured out a way to get money off of the internet darker depths without pandering to it, I guess. Anyway, great episode.

Oddworld Inhabitant
Guest

Tried to include a link to the CM comics I referenced, but it didn’t show. Attempt #2!
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/comicsandcosplay/comics/critical-miss/14708-God-Emperor-Sarkeesian

RockmanX3
Guest

Hey Anita, you might want start eating better. That diet’s making you way too thin.

RockmanX3
Guest

Also, is Anita really living off Kickstarter money?

StormWolf
Guest

Well she’s certainly not providing the content to her backers in a timely manner, that’s for sure.

RockmanX3
Guest

If someone is getting paid six figures to say Samus Aran’s boobs are objectifying women, then I don’t want to live on this planet anymore.

Dethhollow
Guest
Not just Samus’s boobs…. EVERY fictional woman’s boobs are apparently objectifying women as long as the game is popular enough to milk outrage from! Unless they’re somehow covering their boobs up with a thick outfit or something, that is. Then, people claim that they’re misogynist because the character isn’t feminine enough and they’re just a way to shame women from their sexuality or something. Right off the bat, you just can’t win against people with a hypercritical mindset like that because they’ll be offended no matter what you do on appearance alone. And that’s not even getting into the contradictory… Read more »
faelon
Guest
Samus Aran would be a perfectly timely and modern reference for FemFreq to complain about. I think her latest video has her ranting about Joanna Dark in the N64 game Perfect Dark. It’s like she is somehow unstuck in time and space and has no concept of things like years, decades, generations, other continents or cultures, or how anything fits together in actual context. I think her Lego video is what made me write her off as a fraud. She spent almost an hour ranting about Lego’s marketing practices… circa 1978, all while implying to the audience that they were… Read more »
DeTroutSpinners
Guest

Again, the best thing the games industry and community can do is to just ignore this single-noted sexist idiot and her uneducated, unresearched bullshit. Not likely as long as she has the intelligentsia dipshits of the media blindly pandering to her, but still possible. Those who refuse to challenge her should just be shamed and excluded from the discussion, just as she blocks anyone who disagrees with her (which includes many, many more female gamers than those who support her).

ladydiskette
Guest

Shots fired!

StormWolf
Guest

*grabs a giant bucket of popcorn and waits for the glorious shitstorm to come*

MonsieurMoustache
Guest

…How are you on Channel Awesome? This is so against the morals of the people I’ve come to love on this site. It’s demeaning, cruel, and without substance or real evidence of argument. You add nothing to this conversation that Men Right’s bros on Youtube haven’t done already in similar whiny tones. It’s insulting and yeah, kinda sexist, but more importantly, dumb. Really really dumb. I expect better from these creators and this website.

StormWolf
Guest

Yesssss, here we go. *munch munch*

someoldbird
Guest

what he said

AlucardNoir
Guest

You know, I remember seeing her first games video, I liked it, then when I saw there were two others I even subscribed, then I saw the second one and couldn’t even give it a like(or was YouTube still using stars them?) and then after seeing the third I unsubscribed.

You have to know literally nothing about video games to watch that series and believe anything that comes out of her mouth.

cannedfury
Guest

At least one of the creators here is part of #Gamergate and another made a video entirely about hating SJWs. Agree with their views or not, you have no idea what site you’re on.

Dethhollow
Guest
OK, so you believe Anita is trying to be a legitimate critic of games that actually wants to do good for the industry, right? Since that’s the main part of the video and one of the big things you’re offended about, right? If that’s the case, I dare you to list what an actual empowering female character would be according to Anita. As far as I know, all she’s done is tear characters and games down and point out the “flaws” in their representation…. If she was someone trying to acheave a legitimate goal then it shouldn’t be hard to… Read more »
Mikesean45
Guest

You know she does game reviews as well, right? And she’s praised plenty of representations in those. She generally doesn’t sing much praise in her Tropes videos because that’s not what they’re about.

Though actually, in her most recent Tropes video, she praises a couple games that subvert the trope she’s discussing.

Jingus
Guest

No, the kind of people who whine about Anita don’t actually know those things, because typically they don’t watch her videos.

Jon9
Guest
Then I would say that you are massively guilty of failing to pay attention. If you had, you might have noticed that two of the videos she produced were entitled “Positive Female Characters”. These referred to Jade from Beyond Good and Evil, and the Scythian from Superbrothers: Sword and Sworcery EP. You could also have searched for her easily findable Steam profile, where she has a “Recommendations List”. From there, considering the games that are on there, you could also infer that she considers Faith from Mirrors Edge, Chell from Portal, Max Caulfield from Life is Strange, and a good… Read more »
tvesrb
Guest

I see a lot of people crying harassment on her behalf, but none of those people are capable of rebutting any of the criticism against her. too busy being a knight in shining armor to take a good hard look at who you’re defending.

LaserBunny
Guest

That is Anita’s goal To create a cult to defend her so she can promote hate and sexism in peace.

Dromedary Meat Cactus
Guest
Dromedary Meat Cactus

” none of those people are capable of rebutting any of the criticism against her.”

Bullshit. It’s been done dozens of times in essays and videos. Maybe we get sick of addressing the childish claims of Anita haters based on rumors spread among morons.

bionikler
Guest

FEED THE FIRE! NNNNNNNNGGGGGHHHHHHAAAAAaaaa….

Warp
Guest

It’s worth to see the SJW’s cry. I really love the taste of feminist tears. Keep them coming.

That weird guy
Guest

I stand by your opinion! This video is just trying to take away credibility and reducing the arguments to a maniacally screaming sock puppet yelling “Misogyny!”

I don’t want stuff like this here. This was a civilized place once

pprandomnpz
Guest

I’m a bit suspicious of this video, not because of the content, but this is channel awesome we’re talking about, man. Home of Linkara, Nostalgia Chick and a bunch of others like that. I liked it though, so kudos there.

The Crazed Spruce
Guest

Not sure what’s gonna be more entertaining, Anita Sarkeesian’s response on The Young Turks, or the “If TYT Were Honest” video that’s bound to follow.

Hey, StormWolf, could you pass the popcorn? 🙂

StormWolf
Guest

I brought enough for the *whole* class. 😉

JetZXV
Guest

Yaaaay! We’re watching a shitstorm in class today!

intothebreach
Guest

Pass that shit. Watching people not comprehend the idea of satire is going to be good.

RockmanX3
Guest

I brought the salt!

Doom404
Guest

I brought the butter!!

Chicken Puppet
Guest

I think you have Anna Kasparian (who once did a segment video trashing gamers, ) from the Young Turks with Anita Sarkesian of Feminist Frequency.

Anna Kasparian co-hosts a political news and opinion show, and rarely dabbles in gaming news at all.

The Crazed Spruce
Guest

Yeah, I realized that after the fact. Kindly disregard my comment.

Mikesean45
Guest

Well, damn. That was much less ironic than I was expecting.

I just really don’t get what’s so bad about her videos. I just watched her new one and it was pretty harmless.

Dethhollow
Guest
As far as I’ve seen and heard, she just rails on everything. Everything is an offensive female character or an offensive portrayal or something and it gets to the point where it becomes clear that there are no positive examples because their complaints are often contradictory or impossible to do all-together. Have their been empowering female characters? Of course. Has the channel even mentioned them or explained what writers should do to make a good female character? Not to my knowledge. They’re just cashing in on either ‘easy targets’ or popular games specifically meant to invoke rage and they’ll never… Read more »
Cassiopeia.S
Guest

“Have their been empowering female characters? Of course. Has the channel even mentioned them or explained what writers should do to make a good female character? Not to my knowledge.”

Serious question: what is your knowledge of her videos? I’m not saying you have to watch them (if you think you’re not likely to like a media review, don’t bother with it), but if you’re not watching them all the way through then you can’t say what is or isn’t included. I haven’t seen all of her videos, but most of her videos that I’ve seen include positive examples.

Mikesean45
Guest

I mean…have you actually *watched* her videos? I ask because a lot of people I see “criticizing” her tend to think she said these totally extreme and wacky things that she doesn’t actually say in her videos.

Or the “cashing in” part. She made a small kickstarter 4 years ago and a new one for a more ambitious project recently. She doesn’t put ads on her videos, she doesn’t have a patreon, and her company is a nonprofit. Seriously, I don’t understand why people talk like she’s scamming people out of their life savings.

Warp
Guest
The major problem with her videos is that she makes a lot of assertions and claims that are demonstrably false, distorted or exaggerated. The videos are hugely sensationalistic. She blows things completely out of proportions and, in some cases, she’s outright lying. And she is painting the gaming community and the gaming industry as completely depraved and highly toxic, based on the actions of a small minority (and sometimes not even that). She is, essentially, a highly successful Jack Thompson. “Well, what’s the deal? Thousands of youtubers do exactly that!” Right, but the problem is that she is extremely influential,… Read more »
Cassiopeia.S
Guest
I don’t agree with everything Sarkeesian says, but there is one important error you made: “I say something uninformed, people complain, I cry misogyny, and people fund my Kickstarter!” The misogyny and kickstarter-funding happened long before she had said anything uninformed about video games. She said she wanted to analyze media from a particular perspective: If you’re on Channel Awesome, you clearly have no objection to that. But the series hadn’t started yet, and arguing against someone’s speech BEFORE THEY’VE EVEN SAID ANYTHING makes it pretty clear that your objection isn’t actually with the content of their speech. Did the… Read more »
someoldbird
Guest
“misogyny and kickstarter-funding happened long before she had said anything uninformed about video games” In her kickstarter pitch for tropes vs. women, Anita outlined the subject of 12 videos she promised to make, saying they would be “heavily researched”. Basically, she hadn’t done any “research” but already knew she was going to complain about 12 specific things. You could say she was “arguing against someone’s speech (video games) BEFORE [SHE’D] EVEN [PLAYED] ANYTHING [making] it pretty clear that [her] objection isn’t actually with the content of [the games].” Of course, she ultimately didn’t actually do any research, unless you count… Read more »
Cassiopeia.S
Guest
“Anita outlined the subject of 12 videos she promised to make,” No she didn’t, the original pitch was only for 5 videos, each covering one stereotypical representation of women. She didn’t argue against a single specific game in the pitch, and she also pointed out that each video would include positive examples. To reasonably make these claims, you have to know 1. That these 5 cliches exist in some video games and 2. That you have at least 1 positive and 1 negative example for each cliche. The first is fairly obvious, and the latter is a safe assumption. She… Read more »
Liebermintz
Guest
You’re still pissed that Shane Black took out a villain so steeped in Cold War racism and wrote him off as a byproduct of an overeager villain and his actor friend? To tell you the truth, I know the Mandarin is supposed to be Iron Man’s Lex Luthor. The problem is that while Lex can be removed from whatever bubble he was supposed to be created under, the Mandarin is proving one tough cookie to get removed from the bubble. Anita promised a lot of things, yes, and she didn’t deliver. Which makes the second Kickstarter kind of, well, stupid.… Read more »
Dromedary Meat Cactus
Guest
Dromedary Meat Cactus

“we gave her something like $150,000”

I seriously doubt you’re part of the “we,” so stop pretending to care about the well-being of people who actually contributed to her campaign.

coredumperror
Guest

As I recall, she made some blatantly uninformed comments in the video for her kickstarter campaign. And don’t forget that she apparently now has a second kickstarter campaign, so they’re 100% right with their timeline.

Cassiopeia.S
Guest
I re-watched it yesterday to make sure I wasn’t misremembering, and didn’t notice anything inaccurate. She didn’t talk about any specific games, and the only statements she made about games as a whole are that they can accomplish a lot of good but many include harmful stereotypes. Those are obviously extremely broad, but not remotely false as far as I know. I love video games and don’t agree with much of what she says, but no one can say that games with harmful stereotypes don’t exist. You can say they’re protected by free speech and have every right to exist… Read more »
Chicken Puppet
Guest

Am I the only one who thinks gaming in general these days is much less misogynistic in content than ever, and that the real issue is a few adult dumbasses and mostly pre-adolescent boys on the internet who get way too much attention for the actual amount of validity or influence they wield?

Real mysogyny exists in the real world, and (not to get too real, but…) things like female genital mutilation, white slavery, and domestic violence are where the focus should be instead of whether it’s sexist that Bayonetta shows off her butt in a video game cutscene?

cannedfury
Guest

You’re on a website where people angrily complain about movies nobody forced them to watch, so yes. “There are worse things so don’t complain” is one of the dumbest arguments you could bring to anything, especially entertainment. If that’s how it worked, we wouldn’t even be allowed to complain about Sarkeesian’s scams because worse crimes exist

Chicken Puppet
Guest
I think you’re really just trying to poke and provoke here, so I’ll just quickly point something out: – This website and a lot of the content creators are doing this all in fun. It’s entertainment. While there is some editorial content, it’s mostly just goofing on nerd culture and old movies and games. – What Feminist Frequency does is *activism*. They are trying to sway public opinion on social issues and point fingers. That’s very different. So not only have you mis-characterized my argument, you also failed to make a valid comparison. When Channel Awesome starts declaring movies and… Read more »
cannedfury
Guest
I just said the argument was dumb regardless of context, so I don’t know why you’re so obsessed with moving those particular goal posts. But since you turned it into a jumble of even dumber arguments, I’ll play along. Channel Awesome trying to sway public opinion or bring change, you say? “Let’s get the comments into the thousands. Tell the Copyright Office your issues with the DMCA! It’s time to take a small step forward and try and begin to start real change. This is really only the first step, and while this whole battle won’t be easy we must… Read more »
Chicken Puppet
Guest
I’ll bite and just quickly make a few points because you really have no argument here. 1) I agree with Sage on the point you brought up , even though I don’t particularly like him as a reviewer or agree with him often. However this does not mean I demand we change anything with political activism. I don’t think he does either. It’s just an opinion about a harmless topic. 2) So we’re just going to ignore 98% of the content on this site which is harmless reviews and satire and focus on the few instances where some content creators… Read more »
cannedfury
Guest
Despite your dubbed anime villain confidence, I’m not sure you know what an argument is. You literally started with a logical fallacy. Liebermintz even broke it down and explained it to you while you thought sensationalism and accusation were valid counterarguments. That’s operating on the same level as trying to shut down discussion by screaming sexism where it doesn’t exist. Which is why people who aren’t even defending Anita are explaining your words are brain poison while you resort to drama. 1) “It’s just an opinion about a harmless topic.” It’s asking to change the standards of a foreign entertainment… Read more »
Liebermintz
Guest
Fallacy of relative privation, duderino, with some “no true Scotsman” zest thrown in. Makes for a good soup. Not the good Blind Melon soup. Internet drama soup. Invoking that “real misogyny” has to refer to outright negative action – and then naming white slavery like “hey guys, Irish slavery was TOTES worse than black slavery! Them blackies got it gud!” or invoking some form of missing white women syndrome (their cases get more press and notoriety than missing women of color); alongside female genital mutilation – does limit things. Okay, then. Ableism. Real ableism is when somebody shoots me in… Read more »
Chicken Puppet
Guest

I don’t think you understand what white slavery means or perhaps I used it incorrectly, I guess I should have said sex trafficking or forced consent.

Anyway, none of that matters because Sarkeesian is a solution looking for a problem, and I have never heard such a melodramatic pity party as your post…and this is the internet where such mentality thrives!

Please save us from the threat that isn’t there in digital interactive entertainment. Maybe we can go back to saying comic books and rock and roll are perverting our youth again!

libertyjim
Guest

I find the people trying to defend Anita to be questionable. She doesn’t get the work she says she’ll do done, she steals video game footage from other youtubers, she started another kickstarter before finishing the project funded by the previous one, she says obviously wrong things that a fuelled by buzz words and despite all this she still gets funded because… ‘misogyny.’

She’s a fraud. Why anyone defends her I don’t know. Most real feminists disagree with most of what she says.

redfarmer
Guest
“Most real feminists disagree with most of what she says.” Then quote them. Quote the most real feminists who disagree with her. The fact is, she is what she is because the #GamerGaters aimed their bullshit campaign against her. You have the right to disagree with her. Where the issue comes in is the 4Chan idiots who fueled and manipulated #GamerGate started a harassment campaign against her and the vast majority of gamers who supported #GamerGate are too naive to see they were manipulated hook, line, and sinker. If not for those who took up #GamerGate, she’d be just another… Read more »
Dethhollow
Guest
The problem is that I don’t think she ever says HOW to make games better. She just goes out, finds whatever problems she can (even if her requirements are contradictory), and rails on the game for having said “problems” without providing any real solutions or even attempting to suggest actual examples or solutions to work from. For example, if you have a female character without a feminine shape due to some outfit or armor or something, you’re just seen as a male character trying to pass for a female or something along those lines which is apparently depowering because it’s… Read more »
Liebermintz
Guest

A film critic mostly points out the flaws in things. Roger Ebert never offered suggestions – he gave you what was wrong and said, “Figure it out yourself.” I think Anita’s trying to do that.

Not successfully – she’s known for being more of a pundit, like a liberal version of Christina Hoff Sommers, who gets interviewed because she’s the Really Popular Feminist. Sommers is popular, but only amongst Fox News viewers and libertarian types. The mainstream won’t give two shits about her.

Cassiopeia.S
Guest

THIS. All of this. Yes.

In fairness I should add, I’m a feminist, and there are things she says that I vehemently disagree with. But framing that as a problem, or a way of discrediting her, is unfair: like-minded people can disagree, that’s one of the hallmarks of a necessary discussion. Using that as a reason to harass her is absolutely ridiculous.

There is something hilarious about the fact that, had no one decided to harass her, she’d just be another mostly-unknown media reviewer on youtube.

coredumperror
Guest

Anita Sarkesian started her uninformed campaign against video games YEARS before GamerGate got started.

Babbleplay
Guest

I’d have gotten a woman actress, to avoid people yelling misogyny at the actor, but, This was amusing as hell.

I don’t hate the woman. If she’d address these, and a few other issues, I’d listen to her defense and explanation, at the very least. ONE of my biggest issues with her is the refusal to even note the calm, rational questioning and detraction, and only point fingers at the psycho doushebag idiot insult threat brigade.

Grimwaldo
Guest
My thougts on this are 2 fold. 1. Why is this group really focused on Feminist Frequency? This is there second video attacking this woman and her work. Threre really is alot of sexist bullshit that exists in the gaming world. Whether it be from save the princess trope to big breasted women fight the big bad guy all the while wearing the chain mail bikini. this is just not a real deception of warrior women of the time who were probably really tall thick women that could wield a weapon just like a man. NOT the big breasted waif… Read more »
TerminalSanity
Guest
1. Because her “work” is shoty spreads a great deal of misinformation and relies on a ironically on viewer ignorance and stereotypes about both video games and gamers at the expense and exploitation of a valid issue discussion about sexism in videogames and popular media. 2. I will in no way “look at her as being more of a example of what is both right and wrong with the medium of video games.” and frankly neither should anyone else Because its painfully clear she hasn’t bothered to actually review the actual content of video games in any substantive fashion beyond… Read more »
Cassiopeia.S
Guest

Thank you so much for pointing out the problems with FemFreq while recognizing that a discussion needs to be had about sexism in video games. Seriously, if more of her detractors took this route, all of us would have less BS to deal with.

Liebermintz
Guest

I was about to say: the first video about her was more an April Fool’s joke that fans demanded be made for real.

This is the “for real” video.

Crumplepunch
Guest

Written by: four dudes.

someoldbird
Guest

Thank you for this video. Thank you so so much. Love how most of what Anita says are actual quotes, and you stuck to the facts about kick starter and production of Tropes Vs. Women. I only wish you would have mentioned how she went to the UN to give a speech about mean Youtube comments, cus you know, if theres anything the governments of the world need to address, its a lack of internet censorship.

Liebermintz
Guest

Because when journalists can get away with outing trans women for utterly petty reasons ON THE INTERNET, there seems to be a little thing repelling people away from the Wild West of the tubes.

Kajzar
Guest
It’s really mindboggling how something that is basically an accessible version of ‘gender studies’ manages to attract so much spite and agression from within the gaming community. Gaming Wildlife takes the easy stance here: that of the people who solely try to slander her, try to discredit her as a person, try to attack her on her intentions rather than on her claims/opinions. Whether you agree or not, that is your own free choice, but the topics she raises are very common for many people who took courses in the humanities. She’s rehashing stuff that is extensively talked about and… Read more »
ColeYote
Guest

+1. I’ve never even watched any of her videos, but Christ, her detractors are obnoxious. To put it diplomatically.

Chicken Puppet
Guest

Perhaps you should watch her videos.

The thing is, people who are deep into gaming culture know a phony.

It’s like this:

I know almost nothing about sports and I rarely watch them, but I have a basic understanding of how they work and I know enough that I could BS other people who don’t know much about sports into believing things about them if I push the right buttons and pretend to be some expert.

But real sports fans would know I was just using the popularity and controversies associated with them to gain notoriety.

ZILtoid1991
Guest
Comedy is dead, gamergate killed it. This isn’t funny. Not because the subject of joke, but because I’ve seen it 10000 times at least. I don’t have problem with people disagreeing with me, even I disagree with Anita Sarkeesian on things, only I don’t make a complete ass out of myself over it, I watch videos made by anti-feminists (as long as they’re not overdoing it), but this has no comedy value. It’s just a live action version of many image macros made by people who never actually watched FemFreq’s videos, and thinks not being able to call minorities racist… Read more »
Jingus
Guest
This would’ve been a hell of a lot more effective if there had been more details about the specific things FF’s supposedly done wrong and less “hey, I can do a shrill-voiced impression of someone I dislike” lazy cheapshots. Like, where’d you get the 400K figure for the organization’s work? Where does the money go, exactly? Nonprofits are legally required to be pretty open about that sort of thing, I seriously doubt Anita is just hoarding it all, the IRS specifically investigates that exact kind of behavior. Where’d she steal the gaming footage? What the hell were you talking about… Read more »
ColeYote
Guest

I have only one thing to say: ugh.

SarahYoungSF
Guest
Of all the hit pieces done on Anita, this has got to be the laziest. It’s a live action meme of all the same tired slanders gamergate and 4chan loves to throw at their favorite punching bag. It’s not worth my time to fully respond to but here are a few points.. The main criticisms always come down to the same points: 1.That Anita is a fraud and “fake” gamer 2.That Anita rips people off 3. That she “plays the victim” 4.That Anita is a puppet of someone else I am a supporter and monthly donor to FemFreq and have… Read more »
Drakon Loki
Guest

I don’t think you understand the concept of a human puppet.

Critic_Critic
Guest

Excellent post, Sarah. Thank you for writing this. 🙂

Chicken Puppet
Guest

“The real question here is this: why does she threaten you so?”

Fallacy detected.

I don’t know if people feel “threatened” by Anita Sarkeesian, but I feel offended and misrepresented as a gamer. I grew up rescuing Zelda and Peach, but also exploring deep caverns and firing death at enemies as Samus Aran and Laura Croft.

None of those experiences made me hate women, just like study after study concludes that video games do not lead to violence no matter how much the advocates want the studies to say otherwise.

Dromedary Meat Cactus
Guest
Dromedary Meat Cactus

She didn’t say what you claim she said (rescuing Zelda makes people hate women), so you obviously have no fucking idea what you’re talking about and are in fact reacting out of fear. Fallacy detected.

turboeli
Guest

This was a cogently argued, comprehensive post that saved the the time of posting many of these arguments. Thanks, Sarah.

Jon9
Guest
To which I respond with… If Anita Sarkeesian’s Haters Were 100% Honest With Us “Hello! This is my seventy second – wait, no, sorry – seventy FIFTH video about why I think this one woman on the internet is wrong. Why have I dedicated so many videos on my channel to her? Because PATREON motherfuckers! That’s right! Internet MRAs are the easiest source of money ever, since they’ll quite happily pour their money into any form of media that will tell them what they want to hear about feminism being evil and wanting to censor us all and take away… Read more »
SarahYoungSF
Guest

This is excellent! Well said Jon9!

Dromedary Meat Cactus
Guest
Dromedary Meat Cactus

High five.

Dechha1981
Guest
Contrary to popular belief, there isn’t just 2 sides to every issue, there’s at LEAST 4; Red, Blue, “can’t we all just get allong?” And “fuck ’em all” Bloods; red. Crisps; blue. Innocent people; peace. L.A.P.D; fuck ’em all. Montahues; red. Capulettes; blue. The Priest; peace. The Prince; fuck ’em all. McDonalds; red. Burger King; blue. Cows; peace. Animal rights activists; fuck ’em all. Red is right because censorship is bad, and I have always utter loathed anyone who tried to get between me and cartoons. Still do. Blue is right because inequality is bad. We need more half-naked men!… Read more »
wpDiscuz